Authors
- Mohammed S. Al-Ak’hali, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
- Esam S. Halboub, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
- Osama H. Mujam, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
- Noor M. Alahmar, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
- Salehah A. Jerah, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
- Fahad A. Mutawwam, From the Departments of Preventive Dentistry (Al-Ak’hali), Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences (Halboub), College of Dentistry (Mujam, Alahmar, Jerah, Mutawwam), Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis and Oral Radiology (Halboub), Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the salivary flow rate (SFR), pH, and buffer capacity (BC) among healthy shammah users (SU) in comparison with healthy non-shammah users (NSU). Methods: This case-control study was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between March 2016 and May 2017. A sample of 27 SU and 30 NSU were recruited. Unstimulated saliva was collected and SFR, pH, and BC were determined. Dental health was assessed using the decay-missing-filled teeth (DMFT) index. Results: Shammah users were slightly older than NSU (28.9±6.9 versus 24.9±4.3 years). Salivary flow rate was not significantly different, but pH (6.68±0.46) and BC (5.7±2.07) were significantly lower in SU users than in NSU (7±0.37; p =0.002 versus 8.1±1.47; p <0.001). Conversely, the DMFT in SU users was significantly higher (7.96±5.17) compared to that of NSU (4.53±3.46; p =0.007). Salivary pH and BC were significantly and directly correlated (rs= 0.576). The former was significantly and directly correlated with SFR (rs= 0.404), but the latter was not. In contrast, BC inversely correlated with decay (rs= -0.385) and DMFT (rs= -0.399). Conclusions: Shammah use is associated with alterations in saliva quality (pH and BC). It is also associated with poor dental health either through a direct effect or mediation by altered salivary parameters.
Article Type
Research Article
Recommended Citation
Al-Ak’hali, Mohammed S.; Halboub, Esam S.; Mujam, Osama H.; Alahmar, Noor M.; Jerah, Salehah A.; and Mutawwam, Fahad A.
(2017)
"Salivary parameters among Arabian snuff (Shammah) users,"
Saudi Medical Journal: Vol. 38:
Iss.
12, Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20973
DOWNLOADS
Since April 09, 2026
COinS