Authors
- Abdelkarim S. Aloweidi, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Sami A. Abu-Halaweh, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Ghazi M. Al-Edwan, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Osama N. Noubani, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Isam K. Bsisu, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Mohammad M. Abufaraj, From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Aloweidi, Abu-Halaweh, Abu Mahfuz, Noubani, Al Rwaidi, Bsisu); from the Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery (Al-Edwan, AL Demour, Abufaraj), School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; and from the Department of Urology (Abufaraj), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare sedoanalgesia achieved using propofol-fentanyl-ketamine (PFK) combination with general anesthesia (GA) in terms of safety, hemodynamic stability, and perioperative complications. Methods: Patients in the GA group were anesthetized using fentanyl (2 μg kg-1) and propofol (2 mg kg-1). The PFK group was anesthetized using a mixture of which each one ml contains 0.005 mg of fentanyl, 5 mg of propofol, 5 mg of ketamine, and 2 mg of lidocaine. Patients received an initial dose of 0.05 ml kg-1, followed by 0.05 mg kg-1 60 seconds later. Maintenance boluses of 0.025 ml kg-1 were administered every 3-5 minutes. Respiration occurred spontaneously through a simple face mask with 3 L min-1 O 2 . Results: The GA group had 37 (37%) patients develop hypotensive episodes, compared to one (1%) episode in the PFK group ( p <0.001). Five (5%) patients in the PFK group had an episode of transient O 2 desaturation, compared to one (1%) patient in the GA group ( p =0.212). The duration of induction and termination of anesthesia were significantly shorter in the PFK group ( p <0.001). Conclusion: The PFK combination herein described is safe, effective, and provides intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients with multiple comorbidities undergoing urological procedures.
Article Type
Research Article
Recommended Citation
Aloweidi, Abdelkarim S.; Abu-Halaweh, Sami A.; Al-Edwan, Ghazi M.; Noubani, Osama N.; Bsisu, Isam K.; and Abufaraj, Mohammad M.
(2021)
"The combinatorial use of propofol-fentanyl-ketamine for sedoanalgesia in patients undergoing urological procedures,"
Saudi Medical Journal: Vol. 42:
Iss.
6, Article 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20210071
DOWNLOADS
Since April 09, 2026
COinS